Readify

Prohibition era

Passing (Nella Larsen Edition)

The Prohibition era (1920–1933) forms a significant social and urban backdrop to Passing, set in 1927. In Harlem, the growth of nightlife brings Black and white New Yorkers into shared entertainment spaces, yet access remains structured by segregation. The novel’s period is therefore not simply one of modern urban possibility: public visibility, racial scrutiny, and the boundaries of belonging accompany the city’s attractions.

Harlem nightlife and its geography

The area around Lenox Avenue and Seventh Avenue, between 125th and 135th Streets, was the center of Prohibition Harlem’s speakeasy district. Its many speakeasies, lounges, cafés, supper clubs, theaters, ballrooms, and dance halls made it a dense landscape of illicit and illegal recreation. The Cotton Club stood at Lenox Avenue and 125th Street; Hurtig and Seamon’s Burlesque later became the Apollo Theater. These venues belonged to a nightlife that was flourishing during the novel’s period, but their apparent variety did not mean equal access.

Segregation marked the district’s entertainment economy. Many establishments featured Black performers while admitting Black patrons only after white audiences had gone home. Theaters also differed in whom they served: the Alhambra and the Crescent were identified as Black theaters, while the Cotton Club and Connie’s Inn were whites-only venues. Small’s Paradise and Barron Wilkins’s Club were likewise among the major clubs described as whites-only. The result was a public culture in which Black performance could be commercially visible even as Black customers faced exclusion from spaces organized around it.

The novel’s 1927 city

Passing places this nightlife within the wider movement of people and attention between Chicago and New York. The novel’s opening remembered episode takes place in Chicago in August; its main action and denouement occur in New York City, where Harlem is associated with the cultural prominence of the New Negro and the expanding public presence of women. Urban mobility matters to the novel’s treatment of racial passing: cities can offer anonymity and room for self-presentation, while crowded public settings also expose people to observation and recognition.

In a conversation about Hugh Wentworth attending a Harlem dance, Irene Redfield identifies the year as 1927 and says that white people of his type increasingly come to Harlem affairs. Brian Redfield imagines a reversal in which Black people might soon be barred from such events or assigned Jim Crow laws-style sections. The exchange makes the dance more than a setting for social amusement: it exposes the unequal terms on which interracial spectatorship takes place. White visitors can enter to look at Black life, while the prospect of Black exclusion remains thinkable even in Harlem.

The period’s public encounters also carry the possibility of sudden recognition. When Irene and Felise Freeland turn from the Avenue into Fifty-seventh Street while shopping, a gust of wind pushes them into a collision with a man; Irene looks up and recognizes Clare Kendry’s husband. The encounter takes place downtown rather than in Harlem nightlife, but it similarly shows how movement through the city brings people and concealed social ties into unexpected contact.

Race, law, and the limits of mobility

The racial order surrounding the novel predates Prohibition, though it continues to shape life during the era. The history of slavery and its aftermath tied racial classification to freedom, social standing, and material privilege; whiteness was treated as a valuable property withheld from Black people. Plessy v. Ferguson codified the color line through the doctrine of separate but equal, while the one-drop rule and Jim Crow laws reinforced the claim that race was fixed by ancestry. Passing narratives challenge that claim by showing how unstable racial classifications become when legal definitions, social assumptions, and visible appearance do not align.

The Rhinelander case provides a particularly close legal-historical context for the novel’s 1927 setting. Leonard Kip Rhinelander married Alice B. Jones in 1924 and sought an annulment after the marriage, alleging that she had concealed her Black ancestry. At trial, Jones maintained that her husband knew her racial status before they married; the jury found in her favor in 1925. The case made marriage, racial identity, and the rights attached to whiteness matters of public legal dispute. Its relevance to Passing lies not in Prohibition policy, but in the contemporary scrutiny of interracial marriage and the power of courts and custom to define racial belonging.

Significance as a period setting

The Prohibition era’s Harlem nightlife condenses the novel’s tension between mobility and constraint. Commercial entertainment and urban crowds create opportunities for movement, encounter, and observation, but segregation determines who can participate and who is treated as an audience for someone else’s culture. By locating its 1927 characters amid this uneven public life, Passing links the modern city’s promise of anonymity to the persistence of racial hierarchy: movement across streets and social spaces is possible, but it does not erase the structures that govern access, recognition, and belonging.